Virginia Tech
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
241  Andrew Gaiser JR 32:20
280  Daniel Jaskowak JR 32:26
364  Brent Musselman JR 32:40
413  Diego Zarate SO 32:45
429  Jack Joyce FR 32:48
514  Vincent Ciattei JR 32:56
667  Daniel Rau JR 33:14
836  Ashkan Mohammadi JR 33:31
842  Andrew Eason SO 33:31
974  Baron Kieffer FR 33:41
National Rank #57 of 312
Southeast Region Rank #8 of 48
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 1.0%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.1%
Top 5 in Regional 48.6%
Top 10 in Regional 99.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Andrew Gaiser Daniel Jaskowak Brent Musselman Diego Zarate Jack Joyce Vincent Ciattei Daniel Rau Ashkan Mohammadi Andrew Eason Baron Kieffer
Virginia Tech Alumni Invitational 09/16 876 32:26 32:27 32:46 32:48 32:27 33:45
Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/01 799 32:08 32:33 32:32 32:41 32:45 33:16 34:14 33:22 33:17
Penn State National Open 10/14 869 32:28 32:29 32:34 32:51 32:42 32:32 32:59 33:20 34:01
ACC Championships 10/28 782 32:04 32:05 32:46 32:18 32:52 32:54 33:23 33:32 33:35 33:40
Southeast Region Championships 11/11 823 32:15 32:19 32:02 33:03 33:01 34:22 33:17





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 1.0% 27.8 698 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2
Region Championship 100% 5.5 183 0.1 0.8 3.4 15.5 28.9 35.8 10.1 4.4 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Andrew Gaiser 1.1% 150.5
Daniel Jaskowak 1.0% 168.0
Brent Musselman 1.0% 180.0
Diego Zarate 1.0% 181.0
Jack Joyce 1.0% 188.0
Vincent Ciattei 1.0% 226.0
Daniel Rau 1.0% 223.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Andrew Gaiser 23.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.1 1.3 2.2 2.8 2.8 3.7 4.9 5.0 5.4 5.5 5.6 4.5 3.4 4.0 3.2
Daniel Jaskowak 26.7 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 1.0 1.9 1.6 2.7 2.7 2.9 4.3 4.7 4.4 4.7 4.2 3.8 4.4
Brent Musselman 37.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 0.9 2.2 2.0 2.8 2.2 3.2
Diego Zarate 41.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.8 1.2 1.2 1.6 2.1
Jack Joyce 45.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.1 0.7 0.9
Vincent Ciattei 53.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3
Daniel Rau 71.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 1
2 0.8% 100.0% 0.8 0.8 2
3 3.4% 4.5% 0.1 0.1 0.1 3.2 0.2 3
4 15.5% 15.5 4
5 28.9% 28.9 5
6 35.8% 35.8 6
7 10.1% 10.1 7
8 4.4% 4.4 8
9 0.8% 0.8 9
10 0.3% 0.3 10
11 0.1% 0.1 11
12 0.1% 0.1 12
13 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
Total 100% 1.0% 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 99.0 0.9 0.2




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Mid. Tenn. State 81.0% 1.0 0.8
Texas 56.7% 1.0 0.6
Florida State 14.8% 1.0 0.1
Georgia Tech 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 1.5
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0